Get cash from your website. Sign up as affiliate

Kamis, 27 Januari 2011

“Pop diSpencer: Monetary fictions drive daily interactions - MySanAntonio”

“Pop diSpencer: Monetary fictions drive daily interactions - MySanAntonio”


Pop diSpencer: Monetary fictions drive daily interactions - MySanAntonio

Posted: 19 Jan 2011 08:10 PM PST

People just love things that claim to explore the "hidden side" of other things. I'm no expert, but if I had to take a guess, I would guess that this is a large portion of the success of Freakonomics , the book by economist Steven Levitt and journalist Stephen J. Dubner.

Dubner came to speak at Templeton-Blackburn Alumni Memorial Auditorium last week, and because I love the hidden side of things just as much as the next person, I went. He talked about extra hidden sides, and hidden sides of the hidden sides, so it was definitely worth my time.

As my friend pointed out, though, what Dubner and Levitt do is not really economics. Rather, it's basically sociology with numbers. Dubner and Levitt would probably argue that the two are interchangeable. That's because Dubner and Levitt are convinced that money drives every human interaction.

They have a lot of evidence for this belief. They've studied doctors washing their hands, rat infestations, sumo wrestlers and real estate agents. And just about every time, "the hidden side" is money.

I don't have anything against money. In fact, if I had it my way, I would have more of it and so would you. But I have a fundamental problem with money. See, money isn't real. It's a fiction. Money isn't like air or water or sunlight. It might be a commodity, but it's an artificial one.

I was reminded of this fact while listening to a recent This American Life called "The Invention of Money." There was a story about an island Yap where the inhabitants use big stones as money. The stones never move, but ownership changes similar to how money would normally be exchanged.

If members of a rival tribe want a prisoner back, they might trade one of their giant stones. The stone stays where it is, but now the opposite tribe owns it.

At first, this story seems slightly ridiculous, and we scoff at its simplicity. The truth is, though, that our idea of money is not really any different. Today, most of our money is online anyway. It never exchanges hands; we hardly ever see it. Our money might as well be giant stones.

I'm wary of being convinced that all human interaction is driven by a fiction. Maybe I have too much faith in mankind, or maybe I think people are smarter than they actually are; but I think life is way more complicated than nickels and dimes.

I suppose if pressed, Dubner would admit that life can't be simplified down to money. He would say, though, that life can be simplified down to incentives, which is only a step above money and probably just as fictitious.

Incentives are often arbitrary and imagined, especially when you follow a chain of incentives. For example, I study for a test to get an A in the class. I want an A in the class so I can be happier. But will an A really make me happier? It's debatable.

So, yes, the hidden side of quite a few things can be explained with numbers and money, but does that really mean that the hidden side of all things can be explained with numbers and money?

Spencer Smith is a sophomore studying philosophy and English and a columnist for The Post. Want to trade nickels and dimes for stones and pebbles? E-mail him at ss335808@ohiou.edu.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Collateral Damage - WikiLeaks In The Crosshairs.

Rabu, 26 Januari 2011

“Design's flexible future - Los Angeles Times”

“Design's flexible future - Los Angeles Times”


Design's flexible future - Los Angeles Times

Posted: 26 Jan 2011 03:30 PM PST

In a space once reserved only for fiercely practical ideas with clear applications for military technology, pure fiction and whimsy now rule. The Wind Tunnel Gallery, a renovated supersonic aircraft testing facility in Pasadena that houses the Art Center College of Design's graduate media design program, is hung with models, paintings and computer renderings of objects and processes that can't actually exist, or won't work, or confuse the whole notion of utility. And yes, that's the point.

Saturday evening kicks off a nearly two month-long exhibition and speaker series called "Made Up: Design's Fictions" that explores the importance of practicality in design. Work featured in the show probes a less-familiar offshoot of design theory called "design fiction" and includes never-before-seen items for unknown futures, alternate presents and other contexts that don't yet or might never exist. Graduates and faculty of the college's media design program as well as international designers have contributed posters, photographs, illustrations, digital films and all manner of objects to the exhibition, all of which help dismantle the commonly understood purpose of design.

"There's a long tradition in fields of design for speculation and more far-reaching types of work," said Tim Durfee, a member of the program's core faculty and curator of the exhibition. "Ledoux and Boullée and these other famous architects started making these unbuildable designs — fantastic to look at and just imagine. From there, there sort of became this subculture of impossible design."


Preparing students for the unknown is the basis of the program's curriculum, creating designers who can imagine the unimaginable. Made Up showcases successful works of flexibility and openness to new ideas.

Take, for instance, "The Rather Large Array," a 50-foot wooden beam that visitors to the former aerodynamics lab will see suspended from a network of PVC support rigging. Some 24 cameras are mounted on the beam itself to collect images from the reception. The images will be projected in real time onto a window in the gallery and later be printed out on the premises, creating a sort of live catalog of the show.

If all that sounds a touch complicated, that's because it is. But for Durfee, experimenting with structural complexity in the name of philosophical complexity ("Who we are is not just where we are at the moment") offers opportunities for growth. In addition to academic tradition, he cites strong interest from the students as inspiration for the project.

Durfee will be joined by architect-designer Fiona Raby and Wired.com blogger and science-fiction writer Bruce Sterling in speaking at Saturday's panel discussion. As a self-proclaimed big Internet guy, Sterling recognizes the appeal of design fiction.

"The thing that interests me about design fiction, which is a young and not yet very well-defined idea, is that on the Internet you can bring all kinds of things to the process of design that make a prototype look a lot more convincing than it used to be," he said.

Sterling, who held the lofty title of visionary in residence at the Art Center five years ago, sees this mode of free-form design as an advantage for students, who are routinely short on the resources they would need to execute their ideas.

Encouraging students to question limitations is standard operating procedure for Art Center faculty. Students in the school's graduate-level media design program aren't even given clear direction as to what sort of final project they should be working toward. Anne Burdick, the program chair, believes the lack of "prescribed outcomes" keeps students on their toes.

"Of course, it's scary, right? And anxiety-inducing and exhilarating," Burdick said. "But I think they fluctuate between being terrified and being thrilled, and I think we feel that way all the time too."

Burdick said students coming out of the media design program are wanted by prospective employers precisely because their thinking is so different.

"They're really sought after because they're able to work in fluid situations, they're able to communicate across disciplines and across cultures, they're able to make it up on the fly," she said. "And so it makes them really flexible and perfectly educated for the moment."

"This increasing sense of change, that the future is getting a little bit closer and closer, is not news to anybody. All of a sudden, it's no longer a dreamy, flighty thing to imagine designing for a world that isn't here yet," Durfee said.

"It's actually a necessary thing," Burdick said.

calendar@latimes.com

"Made Up: Design's Fictions" panel and opening reception

Where: Wind Tunnel Gallery, Art Center College of Design's South Campus, 950 S. Raymond Ave., Pasadena

When: Lectures and discussion, 5 to 7 p.m. Saturday; opening reception, 7 to 10 p.m.

Price: Free

Info: (626) 396-2469; http://www.artcenter.edu/mdp/madeup

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Collateral Damage - WikiLeaks In The Crosshairs.

Senin, 24 Januari 2011

“Datebook: Events, classes, exhibits for the week ahead - Los Angeles Times”

“Datebook: Events, classes, exhibits for the week ahead - Los Angeles Times”


Datebook: Events, classes, exhibits for the week ahead - Los Angeles Times

Posted: 24 Jan 2011 06:14 AM PST

Nelson
We've listed select home and garden events below. Suggest your own via reader comments. Submissions must be fewer than 75 words and must be for one-time events with legitimate value to other readers. No store promotions and no frivolous links, please. L.A. at Home staff will determine which submissions will be made public, but we won't edit the text.

Monday: Architects Cristína Diaz Moreno and Efrén Garcia Grinda of the Madrid office Amid (Cero 9) lecture as part of UCLA Architecture and Urban Design's Beyond the Fringe lecture series. 6:30 p.m. Free. Perloff Hall, UCLA. Free. (310) 267-4704.

Thursday: The latest installment in the Los Angeles County Arboretum & Botanic Garden's Thursday Garden Talks With Lili Singer is a tour of four Pasadena gardens designed by landscape designer Laramee Haynes. $20. Registration required: (626) 821-4623.

Thursday: Nader Tehrani of NADAAA Architecture and Sharon Johnston of Johnston Marklee, who collaborated on the award-winning Helios House, present the lecture "Nip Tuck Diptych," a look at the shaping of architectural forms.  7:30 p.m. Doors open at 7 p.m. Reception follows at 9 p.m. Museum of Contemporary Art, 250 S. Grand Ave., downtown Los Angeles. Free. (310) 665-6867.
 
Saturday: Pasadena artist Kenton Nelson, pictured above, discusses his work and opens his rarely seen studio for "Art, Architecture and California Culture: The Works of Kenton Nelson," part of this year's Sidney D. Gamble Lecture series. 1 p.m. $12 for lecture, $15 to $20 for tour. Ahmanson Auditorium, Art Center College of Design, 1700 Lida St., Pasadena. (626) 793-3334, Ext. 52.

Saturday: "Made Up: Design's Fictions," an exhibition of work by the graduate Media Design Program at Art Center. Ends March 20.  Opening reception, 7 to 10 p.m. Saturday.  A panel discussion with Fiona Raby, partner at Dunne & Raby, and Bruce Sterling, author of "Tomorrow Now and Shaping Things," will be held from 5 to 7 p.m. Wind Tunnel Gallery, Art Center College of Design, South Campus, 950 S. Raymond Ave., Pasadena.  Free.  (626) 396-2469.

ONGOING:

Ackerman, Aguiñiga: Two new shows. "A Marriage of Craft and Design: The Work of Evelyn and Jerome Ackerman" includes examples of ceramics, tile mosaics, wood carvings, textiles and other crafts from the Culver City couple. "Crossing the Line: A Space by Tanya Aguiñiga," is a site-specific structure made by the artist best known for felted furniture. Opening reception from 6 to 9 p.m. $10. Craft and Folk Art Museum, 5814 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles. (323) 937-4230.

Bischoff exhibition: The retrospective "Gardens and Grandeur: Porcelains and Paintings by Franz A. Bischoff," features Bischoff's early hand-painted ceramic works and landscape paintings. Noon to 5 p.m. Wednesdays through Sundays, through March 20. $5 to $7. Pasadena Museum of California Art, 490 E. Union St., Pasadena. (626) 568-3665.

Brown Bag Tuesdays: The Gamble House, the Arts and Crafts landmark designed by Charles and Henry Greene, allows visitors to picnic on the rear lawn or terrace of the 1908 estate between 11:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. Tuesdays. Twenty-minute docent-led tours will be given at 12:15 and 12:45 p.m. for $5. 4 Westmoreland Place, Pasadena; (626) 793-3334. Reservations: (626) 449-4178.

Installation: "Light Frames," an outdoor installation by Los Angeles architect Gail Peter Borden, consists of a hand-assembled dome and an enclosed "chapel" built out of translucent vinyl plastic. 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. daily through mid-March. Free. Materials & Applications, 1619 Silver Lake Blvd., Los Angeles. (323) 739-4668.

Kalman exhibition: "Maira Kalman: Various Observations (of a Crazy World)" features more than 100 artworks and an installation that Kalman calls "many tables of many things," her inspirations and collections as a traveler, reader and walker. Noon to 5 p.m. Tuesday through Friday, 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, through Feb. 13. Skirball Cultural Center, 2701 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Los Angeles. $5 to $10. (310) 440-4500.

— Lisa Boone

Photo credit: Los Angeles Times

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Collateral Damage - WikiLeaks In The Crosshairs.

Minggu, 23 Januari 2011

“UK prosecutors reopen phone hacking investigation - YAHOO!”

“UK prosecutors reopen phone hacking investigation - YAHOO!”


UK prosecutors reopen phone hacking investigation - YAHOO!

Posted: 21 Jan 2011 06:49 PM PST

LONDON – Prosecutors said Friday that a politically sensitive investigation into phone hacking charges against one of Britain's best-selling tabloid newspapers would be reopened.

Chief prosecutor Keir Starmer said that a "comprehensive assessment" of all evidence would be held to see whether new charges should be brought in the case involving The News of The World, owned by Rupert Murdoch's media company.

"The purpose of this assessment is to ascertain whether there is any material which could now form evidence in any future criminal prosecution relating to phone hacking," prosecutors said in a statement.

The criminal inquiry will focus new attention on the tabloid's sophisticated phone-tapping operation, which included hacking into cell phones used by senior aides of the royal family in order to listen to voicemail messages.

Actress Sienna Miller and other celebrities have also accused the paper of illegal hacking and harassment, leading to the recent resignation of Ian Edmondson, a top executive.

The News of The World has been at the center of the scandal since a reporter and a private investigator employed by the title were caught illegally eavesdropping on the phones of the British royal family's entourage.

The pair were convicted in 2007, but News of the World executives have long insisted that they were the only ones responsible for the tapping operation — a claim dismissed as implausible by the paper's critics.

The issue is particularly sensitive because the tabloid's former editor, Andy Coulson, who stepped down in the wake of the scandal, now serves as British Prime Minister David Cameron's communications director.

Coulson has long insisted he knew nothing of the illegal goings-on at his paper while he was in charge. He has enjoyed Cameron's support despite the allegations.

But Coulson's story has been challenged by a series of media reports. An article published in The New York Times last year quoted former News of The World reporter Sean Hoare as saying that Coulson was aware of the practice.

Another ex-staff member, Paul McMullan, was quoted by The Guardian as saying he had commissioned private investigators to commit hundreds of illegal acts on the newspaper's behalf — and that Coulson knew.

Labour Party legislator Chris Bryant, who believes he may have been a victim of the phone hackers, said Friday he welcomed the decision to re-examine the case, adding that it should not have been closed last month.

"The evidence that this goes far deeper than one rotten apple has continued to stack up, and so a fresh pair of eyes looking at the case is very welcome," he said.

Bryant said the police had "severely" damaged their credibility by failing to properly investigate earlier.

Coulson and the News of The World have denied the charges.

The News of the World released a statement Friday promising to "cooperate fully" with prosecutors, who had earlier asked the paper's editors if they had information that could be useful in the probe.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.

Sabtu, 22 Januari 2011

“"Multiple Fictions" Drive Opposition to Health Law - Brookings Institution” plus 1 more

“"Multiple Fictions" Drive Opposition to Health Law - Brookings Institution” plus 1 more


"Multiple Fictions" Drive Opposition to Health Law - Brookings Institution

Posted: 18 Jan 2011 03:54 PM PST

While reading "A New Definition of Health Care Reform" by James C. Capretta and Tom Miller, I was reminded of the old adage "if one can frame the debate, one wins the debate."
The health reform debate, they say, is between those who would use government regulation to try to control growth of health care spending and those who would rely on cost-conscious consumers operating in a competitive market place. The right way to reform health care, they say, is not government regulation but rather by shifting to a defined-contribution system in which people would bear the full marginal costs of insurance they buy. Medicare beneficiaries and Medicaid recipients should be given vouchers for the purchase of health insurance. Employers should do the same with private employees. The recently enacted health reform legislation, they say, extends fee-for-service medicine. For that reason, it should be replaced.

This critique is based on multiple fictions—about what the Affordable Care Act does, about what any plausible alternative would do, and about what the real issues in the current debate really are.

First, the federal health law clearly moves the health care system in the very directions that Capretta and Miller urge—toward a defined contribution system.

• That is true for most of the 16 million people who would be covered through the newly created health insurance exchanges. Subsidized clients in the health insurance exchange will receive vouchers to reduce the net cost of a moderate health insurance plan to a fraction of their income. If people want more generous coverage, they will have to pay for it themselves. That is what defined-contribution coverage does.

• Medicaid also is moving fast away from fee-for-service care toward services provided by managed care organizations operating under negotiated contracts with states. That is how most of those newly covered by Medicaid will be served.

• The law will impose a modest tax on high-cost private health plans starting in 2018. This tax will discourage the provision of highly generous insurance plans that accommodate inefficient fee-for-service care.

Like Capretta and Miller, I wish that tax applied to more plans and started sooner. That it does not results from the refusal of Republicans in the course of the reform debate to do anything else than vote "no." The first president to embrace limits on the tax breaks for employer-financed health insurance was Ronald Reagan. Republicans have long embraced such reforms. Had they been true to their tradition and participated actively and constructively in this debate, as a previous generation of Republicans did in the debate leading up to the enactment of Medicare and Medicaid, and as Democrats did in the process leading up to the passage of the Medicare Modernization Act in 2003, there is little doubt that coverage of the tax on high-cost plans would have been broader and it would have started sooner.

The next fiction is the idea that there exists some market-based reform that would operate immaculately free of intrusive government regulation. If consumers are to exercise real leverage on insurance vendors, they have to understand the choices they face. That demands that the range of plans be limited to a manageable number, that marketing of insurance plans be highly regulated and that objective literature written in plain English must be available to customers. It also demands extensive risk adjustment of premiums and subsidies for those who cannot afford the full cost of health insurance. All of this will require heavy government involvement. Come to think of it, each of those steps is part of the health law. If a well-functioning private market place is what Capretta and Miller want, they should be celebrating the bill, not joining calls for its repeal.

No, the health reform debate is not about a fictional war between market-based health insurance and government regulation. It is about whether to provide adequate subsidies to cover the uninsured and whether to begin a process of leveraging change in the delivery and payment systems through which one-sixth of the U.S. economy is devoted to health care. Under this administration's leadership, the last Congress laboriously and narrowly pushed through legislation ending the crippling stasis that virtually all observers of the U.S. health care system deplore. Their handiwork is not perfect, nor can its full effects be anticipated. Further legislation will unquestionably be necessary—to fix provisions that don't work well and to deal with unanticipated consequences of the legislation. Making that legislation work as well as possible now and figuring out what legislation will make it work better in the future should occupy the nation now, rather than a sterile debate based on a false issue and misrepresentation.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.

A 'Warrior Woman' Confronts Mortality, In Verse - NPR News

Posted: 20 Jan 2011 04:06 PM PST

Copyright ©2011 National Public Radio®. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.

January 20, 2011 - NEAL CONAN, host:

This is TALK OF THE NATION. I'm Neal Conan, in Washington.

Writer Maxine Hong Kingston has been looking back for a long time. In her seminal work, "The Woman Warrior," she reached back into her own family history and even further back, into the Chinese folk tales that permeated her childhood.

Her new book is also a memoir, but this time a gentler sort. It's told in free verse and describes a journey that begins on her 65th birthday. It crosses the boundaries of identity, age and culture to pursue what it means to age and what it means to be an elder.

Later in the hour, drug decriminalization in Portugal. After 10 years, did it work?

But first, writer Maxine Hong Kingston. If you, too, have accumulated what she describes as a wealth of time, we want to hear from you. Does age alone make you an elder? How do you know? 800-989-8255. Email us: talk@npr.org. You can also join the conversation on our website. Go to npr.org and click on TALK OF THE NATION.

Maxine Hong Kingston's new book is called "I Love a Broad Margin to My Life," and she joins us from the studios at the University of California at Berkeley.

Nice to have you on the program today.

Ms. MAXINE HONG KINGSTON (Author, "I Love a Broad Margin to My Life"): Thank you. I'm glad to be here.

CONAN: As we said at the beginning, you've been looking back a long time. Is the view different each time you start?

Ms. KINGSTON: Oh, yes. I do feel different every time I start. And often, I - there is some traumatic event, or there are big feelings that I have. And then there's the need to find the words for them or to express them.

And so every time I start, it's a different time of life, and so there are different feelings.

CONAN: You started this particular journey at the age of 65. It's an age - sometimes people are surprised to find themselves 65 years old.

Ms. KINGSTON: Yes. And actually, at the moment, I am 70 years old. And when I was 65, I thought I'd better get a head start on this and start thinking about it and not be in denial and truly face time and aging, and how will I live the remaining years well.

CONAN: You say - it's interesting. The book is, in some ways, a meditation on age yet, not on mortality, really.

Ms. KINGSTON: Well, in a way, it is about mortality, because I ended with a list of my dead, and I - you know, that is something that's not easy to take at this time in one's life, because the friends and family are dying, and people who were your companions as you grew up and grew older, they are leaving life now.

And when my friends and beloved people leave, I feel a draw to go with them, and I want to be with them. And so I do look at mortality, and I think about the feeling of wanting to go with them.

So how do I stop from going with them? I need to think of reasons for staying here and taking up the responsibilities of who I am now.

CONAN: There's a line, you say, you quote Henry David Thoreau - indeed, your title from your book comes sort of from Thoreau. But that's another quote. You say he wanted to live deliberately. And you say I want to die deliberately.

Ms. KINGSTON: Yes.

CONAN: Some people might be alarmed at that.

Ms. KINGSTON: Yes. Oh, I don't think that's alarming. I think that that's very comforting, that we can even learn at the very last moments of our lives. I think of the Tibetan Buddhists, who have an ideal that they would die with their eyes open.

CONAN: Deliberately, in other words.

Ms. KINGSTON: Yeah, yeah. But, you know, it's from Thoreau that I got this line and the title of the book, "I Love a Broad Margin to My Life." And he was writing that and thinking it as he sat in his little house on Walden Pond.

And he was actually sitting on the threshold of the doorway, and he was enjoying having lots of time and lots of space. And he was listening to the birds and the bugs and the - mostly, the silence of the woods.

And then suddenly, he hears the sound of band music, the brass and the drums. And it's martial music. And he says: My neighbors are getting ready to go to war with Mexico.

And then that's when he decides he's not going to pay his taxes to support that war. And I - when Thoreau says I love a broad margin to my life, I also feel that he's talking about national borders, and he's thinking about wide borders.

And so when Thoreau talks about the war with Mexico, I see that as reverberating right into our present time. And we are continuing to draw that border or that margin with Mexico.

CONAN: We're talking with Maxine Hong Kingston, her new book. Well, she just told you the title: "I Love a Broad Margin to My Life." And we'd like to hear from those - the book is, to some degree, about age and becoming an elder. When do you know you're an elder? How did you know? 800-989-8255. Email: talk@npr.org.

And you wrote - you just said a moment ago, you wanted to find out who you were now. The traditional role of those who have gathered that wealth of time you write about is the elder. How do you become an elder in this society, and how do you know you're an elder?

Ms. KINGSTON: Oh, I think that, first of all, you have to have an idea that one can become an elder. I think most people are unconscious of that. And being an elder means that you take up the responsibility, the responsibilities for the world, for educating everybody around you, for being a leader and actually having lived right so that you have the wisdom and the ideas and the vision to make a good world.

The - I admire Martin Luther King, Jr. very much for his - for becoming an elder, even though he was only 39 years old. But he had the vision of the beautiful community, and he worked for that, to build that and to show everybody how that's possible.

Oh, one thing about being an elder or being an older person, I find that I have to find ways to keep my optimism and hope alive and up. I see optimism as being my health, and the - I can't keep going with my teaching and my creating of the beautiful community without optimism.

CONAN: Let's get a caller in on the conversation: 800-989-8255. Ruth is on the line from San Antonio.

RUTH (Caller): All right. Thank you, sir.

CONAN: And are you an elder, Ruth?

RUTH: Well, you tell me. I'm 96.

CONAN: Well, is being an elder just about age?

RUTH: I'm told now that I am an elder. But I wouldn't have known it otherwise, because the important thing is to function and not think of yourself. If you can help others, and if you can manage to get out or see the beautiful things in the world and the things that are interesting and the things even that are ugly so that perhaps you can help in some way to change that, then you're not old. And that is the important thing, not to think of oneself only, but to think of the people around you and what they can mean to society and how you can contribute your own, also.

CONAN: Maxine Hong Kingston, you were trying to get in there.

Ms. KINGSTON: Oh, Ruth, may I ask you a question?

RUTH: I think. Anything.

Ms. KINGSTON: There you are at 96 years old. Do you feel that you are the same person that you were when you were 12 or 20? Do you feel that you are the same person, essentially?

RUTH: Well, if you place it at about 16 or 18 rather than 10 or 12, where you're really hardly only in the process of formation, I would say yes. Ideals remain. Concepts remain. Attitudes towards people remain. The desire to help others is installed by then. Your relation to the universe by then is a little bit more established. And you can see things around you that are around you and not just focus on oneself.

CONAN: Ruth, thank you very much. Those are interesting thoughts. Appreciate it.

RUTH: You're quite welcome. Good luck.

CONAN: Thank you. We're talking with writer Maxine Hong Kingston about growing old and becoming an elder. When did you know you were an elder? How did you know? 800-989-8255. Email us: talk@npr.org.

Stay with us. I'm Neal Conan. It's the TALK OF THE NATION, from NPR News.

(Soundbite of music)

CONAN: This is TALK OF THE NATION, from NPR News. I'm Neal Conan, in Washington.

With a mother and grandmother who lived to be 100, Maxine Hong Kingston sees her age not as 70, but as 30 years to go. We're talking with her this hour about her new book, "I Love a Broad Margin to My Life." You can read more about what she hopes to do with her time at our website. Just go to npr.org. Click on TALK OF THE NATION.

And we want to hear your story. When did you know you were an elder, and how did you know? Give us a call: 800-989-8255. Email us: talk@npr.org. You can also join the conversation on our website. That's at npr.org. Click on TALK OF THE NATION.

AND Let's see if we can go next to Jodi(ph), Jodi with us from Rockford, Illinois.

JODI (Caller): Hi.

CONAN: Hi, Jodi.

JODI: The first time I thought of myself as an elder - I am an RN, and I had taken a lot of advanced nursing classes. And I was teaching, and so I feel like people looked up to me as an elder.

But I think the real time I realized I was an elder was a few years ago, when my mom passed away, and my father had already passed away. So our generation was now the older generation.

CONAN: Mm-hmm. So you were something of the matriarch at that point.

JODI: Mm-hmm.

CONAN: And how did it change your view on the world?

JODI: It made me feel a lot older, for one thing.

(Soundbite of laughter)

JODI: But I kind of felt like I needed to take charge of my nieces and nephews, as my mom had, teaching them about life.

Ms. KINGSTON: You know, Jodi, I like that word that you used, that you realized that you were the matriarch. And I had that feeling, too, when my parents died. All of a sudden, I saw that I was the oldest one, and I'm the oldest one of all the siblings, and I am now the matriarch.

And then one of my first responsibilities as an elder, I thought, oh, I am going to - I'm in charge of Chinese New Years now. And I'm the one...

JODI: Well, and I think - I'm sorry. I didn't mean to interrupt. I think the other thing is I've always been the one that has been in charge of the genealogy in our family.

Ms. KINGSTON: Yes.

JODI: So I really felt a big responsibility to teach all the rest of the family who we were and where we came from.

Ms. KINGSTON: Oh, that's just great. Me, too. I'm also the one in charge of the genealogy and making sure that the stories of the past get passed on. And I think being an elder also means that we know history, and not just the history of our lifetime, but the more reading we do, it makes -when I know history that goes back to the beginnings of time, including anthropology, then I feel that I am very old, that I am centuries old, because I lived history.

JODI: I love history myself, and my mother, what I asked her to do for years and years and years was I bought her a tape recorder and I asked her tell - to tape all those stories that she remembered about the Depression and World War II and just anything she could think of so that that wouldn't pass with her passing.

Ms. KINGSTON: Oh, yeah, yeah. I did that, too. I got a tape recorder and put it in front of my mother when she was about 100, and what she said was: I'm going to sing you an opera that I heard when I was 12 years old. And she sang arias for an hour and a half.

JODI: Oh, my goodness. That's (unintelligible).

(Soundbite of laughter)

CONAN: Jodi, I hope you had equal fun with your mother's recordings.

JODI: Oh, I love it. And every time I look through my mother's things, I find something new that I didn't realize that she had given to me because she basically gave me her scrapbook, which is not really a scrapbook, but a box of just things that she'd saved over the years: newspaper clippings, you name it.

And it's just so special when I look through it, and I find something new and different. And I just feel a responsibility to let the next generation know about it.

CONAN: Jodi, thanks very much for the call. Appreciate it.

JODI: Thank you.

CONAN: Here's an email from Larry in Ponchatoula, Louisiana: You know you are an elder, he writes, when you have more doctors than you have friends.

(Soundbite of laughter)

Ms. KINGSTON: You know what? I don't think that that really defines an elder. I think that means older, but not elder.

CONAN: Well, it's interesting. You tackle aging head-on in this book. You admit, for instance, you hate how you look in a photograph. Is it hard to be honest about those things?

Ms. KINGSTON: No, no, no. It's not hard, to be honest. Maybe a little hard in that I was afraid I was coming across as vain and - when I asked: Am I pretty? And, you know, this does sound so vain, and perhaps I should get rid of that kind of vanity.

On the other hand, I am - oh, maybe what I am trying for is to find a new aesthetic and to find a way of looking at a face and a body and finding the beauty in wrinkles and in a different texture of skin and color of hair. Yeah, it's a matter of making a new aesthetic.

CONAN: Can I ask the same question you asked earlier? And that is: Are you the same person you were at 12, at 16, at 25?

Ms. KINGSTON: Yes. I feel that - I can feel an essential consciousness that's the same. But my body also feels the same. I just feel that I am the same person, and I even have intimations that I was this person during my last incarnation and the one before that.

CONAN: Let's see if we can get another caller on the line. Let's go next to Tim, and Tim's with us from San Jose.

TIM (Caller): Good morning.

CONAN: Hi, Tim.

TIM: My view is I'm 69, and in the last few years, I've noticed that I've started talking differently to younger people. And I get that partly because I felt that a lot of elders that I - or older people that I had talked to really didn't have any messages for me, and I sort of wanted messages.

So I'm deliberately forming some base of communicating and passing on the heritage that I've developed through my life. And also in that conversation and in those remarks that I make, I try to not just reflect on my perfections, but also my imperfections and the mistakes I've made and somehow that I got through them.

Ms. KINGSTON: Oh, I think that's great, Tim, taking on the responsibilities of an elder and finding a way to communicate with younger people.

TIM: Yes. I especially find college students that - I volunteer at San Jose State University with some college students, and they give me a lot, too. They give me hope, because sometimes, I read too much newspaper or listen to too much NPR, and I get sort of, you know, anxious about the future. And I say: Wow, I hate to leave. And I know I'm going to leave in a few years, and that makes me nervous that somehow the world hasn't moved on. But when I see these young people and I hear their hope and their dreams, and they appreciate what I'm doing for them, that really - it just really hits me right in my heart.

CONAN: Tim, thanks very much for the call, appreciate it.

TIM: You're welcome.

CONAN: Here's an email just on his point he mentioned a moment ago: It's my birthday today, writes Bird(ph) in Minneapolis. I'm 42, and I first felt elderly about 10 minutes ago, when I realized I'd been listening to NPR for seven hours straight.

(Soundbite of laughter)

Ms. KINGSTON: Happy birthday, Bird.

CONAN: I wanted to read this, though, from Edward in Albemarle County in Virginia. As a gay man, I knew I was an elder after confronting and continuing to confront the HIV-AIDS epidemic from the 1980s until now. The overbearing emphasis on youth and what is now in gay communities makes me an elder, because I can tell the stories of gay solidarity and fighting AIDS and fighting the (unintelligible) of discrimination that we faced through those decades. Being an elder in gay communities might be 40s or 50s or even 30s, because in all too short frame of reference that comes from emphasis on youth and the attractions and other powers of youth.

Let's go next to David, David with us San Antonio.

DAVID (Caller): Hello, sir.

CONAN: Hi. You're on the air. Go ahead, please.

DAVID: Thank you. I consider myself an elder, and others actually told me I was behaving in a way that was uncommon back in '94, when my 11-year-old daughter was murdered.

CONAN: I'm sorry to hear that.

DAVID: It's all right.

(Soundbite of laughter)

DAVID: And I had to go and explain to my family in Pennsylvania and friends here in town, that it's okay to let go. It's okay. That you have all the memories from the past but you can call them back anytime.

Ms. KINGSTON: Mm-hmm.

CONAN: As you know, David, some people in your situation might, well, harbor grudges and resentments.

(Soundbite of laughter)

DAVID: I understand. I understand. I went through that. I've had - I had - it's not to say that I wasn't mad or angry. But I was - it was very easy to forgive. And it made it easier for me to live at that point. And so that's what I would tell people.

Ms. KINGSTON: David, you're a real elder in that you have experienced life's worst hardships and came out of it with messages of wisdom and how to live. And so, you've been through - it's like going through hell and then making that journey and coming out of it with messages for humanity.

DAVID: When I was younger, I worked on an ambulance. And I've had - as we're transporting them or carrying them out of the house even, I've had people die in my hands and that was 17 - 16 and 17 years old. So, maybe it was from then. I don't know.

Ms. KINGSTON: Mm-hmm.

DAVID: But I don't plan on dying anytime soon. I'm 57 and I figure I'm going to live until at least sometime in the 2200s.

(Soundbite of laughter)

Ms. KINGSTON: Good.

CONAN: David, let us know how it works out.

(Soundbite of laughter)

DAVID: Well, stick around. I'll let you know.

CONAN: Thanks very much.

DAVID: Have a good day.

CONAN: Bye-bye. We're talking with Maxine Hong Kingston about her new book, "I Love a Broad Margin to My Life." And you're listening to TALK OF THE NATION from NPR News.

And this is an email from Steven. And he writes, now, at 71, I believe the way become - one becomes an elder isn't just through years but through awareness. First of all, when we were younger, recognizing those who are elders in our lives, seeing them as valuable and taking them as models for life when we become their ages. Then, when we do wake up in our elder years to accept the role of eldership seriously, and to be a conscious participant in our multigenerational world.

And Maxine Hong Kinston, I wanted to ask you. There's so much emphasis in our society, it seems sometimes...

Ms. KINGSTON: Mm-hmm.

CONAN: ...that retirement is a time to let go of responsibilities, to -and you say, no, no. It's a time to take them up.

Ms. KINGSTON: Well, so often, when we are working to make a living, we -that takes up all the time. And for people who have jobs that don't directly relate to their ideals or their - to their true values, when they're able to let go of that job working for money, then there's lots of time left over to volunteer, to work for the - for ideals and not have to make money at it. So it's really - the older - you know, when we're young, we learned that we have to existentially create our being. When we're older, we continue to existentially grow our elderly self.

CONAN: I also wanted to ask you, so much of your book has been about defining yourself as an American. And also...

Ms. KINGSTON: Mm-hmm.

CONAN: ...defining your background - of course, is Chinese - and your parents' background. You have grown up - they've came from a China that was desperately poor. And you have come to age in an era where China is one of the emerging powers of the world and a strong place. I wonder, how do you think they would have seen that?

Ms. KINGSTON: Oh, my parents?

CONAN: Yeah.

Ms. KINGSTON: I think that it's - they would have always remember our relatives, the - and the people that are peasants, the lowest, poorest peasants. I have cousins, right now, who farm with water buffalo. And I've been to those villages and people are very poor, even though they have more than they used to.

The - when you look at China as this economic giant, that is just - the top people are rich. You know, China is the separation between the rich and the poor. It's the greatest anywhere. Probably, the only other country that has such a difference between the rich and the poor is the U.S.

So I think that my family - they saw China go through communism and the culture revolution. And so, right now, it's just one more change.

CONAN: Maxine Hong Kingston, thank you so much for your time today. Good luck with the book.

Ms. KINGSTON: Thank you.

CONAN: The name of the book is "I Love a Broad Margin to My Life." And Maxine Hong Kingston joined us from a studio at the University of California at Berkeley.

Coming up, 10 years after Portugal's decriminalize drugs. What happened?

Stay with us. TALK OF THE NATION from NPR News.

Copyright © 2011 National Public Radio®. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to National Public Radio. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.

Jumat, 21 Januari 2011

“Opinion: Citizens United 1 Year Later -- Unleash the Corruption - AOL News” plus 1 more

“Opinion: Citizens United 1 Year Later -- Unleash the Corruption - AOL News” plus 1 more


Opinion: Citizens United 1 Year Later -- Unleash the Corruption - AOL News

Posted: 21 Jan 2011 06:28 PM PST

Last month it was reported that incoming Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., "paid a personal visit" to Tom Donohue, the president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, "to thank him for the chamber's unsolicited support of his candidacy." Apparently the senator did not get the memo that all genuflecting before campaign funders should be conducted behind closed doors.

Johnson's visit comes courtesy of the U.S. Supreme Court decision one year ago today in Citizens United v. FEC, which opened the floodgates by allowing for the first time the vast reservoirs of corporate and union treasury funds to swamp federal elections. In a jaw-dropping ruling that ignored precedent, a narrow majority of justices gave a legal wink and nod to those members of Congress who have insisted that money spent to elect them does not buy influence.

Of course, fictions are part of the lifeblood of politics. But sometimes political fictions become law.

Take electioneering ads that masquerade as "issue discussion," with a tag line like, "Call Congressman Doe and tell him to stop beating his wife."

Or take the federal definition of what constitutes "coordination" between candidates and outside actors. The law deems an expenditure made in "coordination" with a candidate to be the equivalent of a contribution, subject to limits and other rules. But the Federal Election Commission has so watered down the law as to make it largely ineffective.

The concept of "coordination" stems from a deeper flaw in campaign finance law dating back to 1976's Buckley v. Valeo. The myth at the core of that Supreme Court decision is that while contributions to candidates and parties are potentially corrupting and therefore can be limited, independent expenditures do not have the same potential, and as a direct exercise of free-speech rights, cannot be limited.

The logic of this aspect of the case and current law is totally untethered from reality. Here's why:

In the Buckley case, the court concluded that campaign contribution limits were justified by the government's interest in preventing or mitigating corruption, or the appearance of corruption, in our democratic system. But it said that spending one's own money independent of a campaign couldn't be limited because that "does not presently appear to pose dangers of real or apparent corruption comparable to those identified with large campaign contributions."

Since an independent expenditure is not controlled by the candidate, the court reasoned, such spending is not likely to create even the appearance of corruption.

How completely stupid!

While a donor who gave the maximum contributions of about $5,000 will get his call returned, imagine what spending $2 million on ads hammering an opponent will buy? It is simply human nature that the candidate is going to feel an understandable sense of gratitude to the big donor.

As a result, Justice Anthony Kennedy's opinion in the Citizens United case -- which extended this independent expenditure exemption to corporations and labor unions -- is based on the complete fiction that an independent expenditure is necessarily less corrupting than a direct contribution. The magnitude of corporate treasury funds is a game changer.

Kennedy's profound disconnect with the real world was underscored by his misinformed belief that current disclosure laws would provide an adequate brake on possible resulting corruption. But corporations can now evade disclosure of their political spending by simply laundering their money through trade associations and 501(c)(4) groups, thus avoiding public exposure and possible backlash.

Sponsored Links

As long as the fiction of independent expenditures persists and the illogic of Citizens United remains unchanged, our country is in for a long and dubious period equivalent to the robber-baron politics of the late 19th century.

Those who say politicians in Washington are not responsive to those who got them elected have it wrong.

Next time you see a TV ad paid for by some innocuous-sounding group, or receive a mailer or phone call from someone who is not the candidate, just remember who the winning candidate will be visiting when he or she arrives back in Washington.

After all, he who pays the piper calls the tune.

Meredith McGehee is policy director of the Campaign Legal Center in Washington, D.C. She also heads up McGehee Strategies, a public interest consulting business.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.

Bloomberg Is Said To Have Erred on Strategy of Reform for New York City Pensions - New York Sun

Posted: 21 Jan 2011 03:57 PM PST

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.

Kamis, 20 Januari 2011

“A Creative Cocktail Of Poetry And History In 'Molotov' - NPR News”

“A Creative Cocktail Of Poetry And History In 'Molotov' - NPR News”


A Creative Cocktail Of Poetry And History In 'Molotov' - NPR News

Posted: 20 Jan 2011 08:27 AM PST

Molotov's Magic Lantern by Rachel Polonsky

 

Molotov's Magic Lantern: Travels in Russian History
By Rachel Polonsky
Hardcover, 416 pages
Farrar, Straus & Giroux
List Price: $27

Prologue

In one corner of Molotov's drawing room stands a magic lantern.

With my back to the window that looks out over Romanov Lane, I wind the brass handle of the lantern, squinting down into the waist-high mahogany obelisk through a glass aperture as faint pictures click past on the revolving slide-carrier. A family group, ladies in old-fashioned bathing suits, smiles across from a rock on the Crimean seashore, hands shading eyes from the sun, then slips into the dark to make way for a staring shaman in torn trousers and a crooked hat; a circle of peasant women creaks past in a ritual dance, turning into three touched-up views of wooden houses and elegant public squares in the Siberian city of Irkutsk.

'Have at it,' the banker had said in his charming smoky drawl, dangling from one finger the keys to his apartment. He had rung our doorbell early as he passed on his way down the stairs. 'You're the scholar, you'll know what to make of it all.'

We had met the evening before at his welcome-to-Moscow party in one of the other Romanov apartments. Over my champagne and his Jack Daniel's, I told him, in my fumbling way, that I was some kind of fugitive academic, not really a journalist, working on a novel . . . He insisted, as certain investment bankers like to do, that he was not an evil capitalist and that he loved books. His true calling was politics, he said; for over a decade he had worked quixotically for the Democratic Party in his home state of Texas.

Our conversation picked up animation when he told me about Molotov's library. I already knew that the apartment he had moved into (immediately above our own) had been the Moscow home, in the last years of his long life, of Stalin's most loyal surviving henchman. I did not know that some of Molotov's possessions had remained in place — left there by the granddaughter who now let the apartment to international financiers — including hundreds of books, some inscribed to him or annotated in his hand, now apparently forgotten, on the lower shelves of closed bookcases in a back corridor.

My new friend the banker cannot have known what a gift he was making when he handed me those keys. In the first moments of my solitude in the grandeur of the Molotov apartment, with its spread of panelled rooms and its high stuccoed ceilings, I sensed that I had reached a destination. It was one of the destinations, even now obscure to me, for which I had made a sudden rush in that restless Cambridge spring, when the yearning to move had formed itself into a plan to come to Moscow. But a destination is rarely what we expect it to be, and destiny has a way of mocking our desires. That is one of the odd pleasures of thinking about history, including one's own, whether one believes it to be moved by chance, or providence, or the secret cunning of the dialectic.

How was I to regard Vyacheslav Molotov's abandoned library? I had not come to Moscow to pore over books like this. I was raised to value books, but these decaying volumes were residues of a malign force, not yet expired. For decades, their owner had been the second most powerful man in Stalin's empire, head of his government machine and his closest and most trusted comrade, a man who collaborated diligently in the tyrant's crimes, condemning millions to cruel deaths. As I lifted the books out of the shelves in soft crumbling piles, I found myself remembering a book that I had read in my teens, a gift from my father, called Nightingale Fever. It was a study by the Oxford scholar Ronald Hingley of the lives and works of four Russian poets — Anna Akhmatova, Osip Mandelstam, Marina Tsvetaeva and Boris Pasternak — 'nightingales' who would not stop singing, each persecuted, in ways that were brutal and exquisite, by the Soviet state that Molotov had been so active in building and sustaining in power. I was stirred then by the way in which, in Russia, the power of poetry is confirmed by politics, by the reactions to these four poets of the men in the Kremlin who thought they could command history. But those men were no more than shadow monsters in the story of the poets my father gave me.

I read their verse, seeing little through the veil of my meager Russian, but compelled by sounds and rhythms, and the intimation of what Mandelstam called the 'monstrously condensed reality' which the modest exterior of lyric art contains. Some lines stayed in my head, like the first couplet of one of the poems in Mandelstam's first collection, Stone:

A body has been given to me, what am I to do with it?

So single and so my own?

I could only read that poem of 1909 — at once so simple and so sophisticated — through the knowledge of Mandelstam's death in a Gulag transit camp three decades later. 'For the quiet joy of breathing and living, whom, tell me, should I thank?' the poet asked:

I am both the gardener and the flower,

in the dungeon of the world I am not solitary.

History is sly, and shapes strange reciprocities. 'If Molotov did not exist', Stalin remarked, 'it would be necessary to invent him.' The nightingale poets, whose songs the Party could not silence, owed their tragic greatness to killers like Molotov. Mandelstam's widow, Nadezhda, says in her memoir Hope Against Hope that the image of 'thin-necked bosses' in the short poem that Mandelstam wrote about Stalin's tyranny (the poem that led to his first arrest in 1934) was inspired by the sight of 'Molotov's thin neck sticking out of his collar and the small head that crowned it. "Just like a tomcat", Mandelstam said, pointing at a portrait of Molotov.' In the course of things, Molotov even did Mandelstam a kindness. It was he who personally arranged a trip to the southern republic of Armenia for Mandelstam in the late 1920s (when his poetic gift had been dry for years), giving instructions to local Party organisations that the poet and his wife should be looked after properly. 'Armenia restored the gift of poetry to Mandelstam', Nadezhda remembered, 'and a new period of his life began'.

Excerpted from Molotov's Magic Lantern by Rachel Polonsky. Copyright © 2011 by Rachel Polonsky. Excerpted with permission by Farrar, Straus and Giroux. All rights reserved.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.

Rabu, 19 Januari 2011

“'Multiple Fictions' Drive Opposition To Health Law - Kaiser Health News” plus 1 more

“'Multiple Fictions' Drive Opposition To Health Law - Kaiser Health News” plus 1 more


'Multiple Fictions' Drive Opposition To Health Law - Kaiser Health News

Posted: 19 Jan 2011 03:38 PM PST

While reading "A New Definition of Health Care Reform" by James C. Capretta and Tom Miller, I was reminded of the old adage "if one can frame the debate, one wins the debate."

The health reform debate, they say, is between those who would use government regulation to try to control growth of health care spending and those who would rely on cost-conscious consumers operating in a competitive market place. The right way to reform health care, they say, is not government regulation but rather by shifting to a defined-contribution system in which people would bear the full marginal costs of insurance they buy. Medicare beneficiaries and Medicaid recipients should be given vouchers for the purchase of health insurance. Employers should do the same with private employees. The recently enacted health reform legislation, they say, extends fee-for-service medicine. For that reason, it should be replaced.

This critique is based on multiple fictions—about what the Affordable Care Act does, about what any plausible alternative would do, and about what the real issues in the current debate really are.

First, the federal health law clearly moves the health care system in the very directions that Capretta and Miller urge—toward a defined contribution system.

• That is true for most of the 16 million people who would be covered through the newly created health insurance exchanges. Subsidized clients in the health insurance exchange will receive vouchers to reduce the net cost of a moderate health insurance plan to a fraction of their income. If people want more generous coverage, they will have to pay for it themselves. That is what defined-contribution coverage does.

• Medicaid also is moving fast away from fee-for-service care toward services provided by managed care organizations operating under negotiated contracts with states. That is how most of those newly covered by Medicaid will be served.

• The law will impose a modest tax on high-cost private health plans starting in 2018. This tax will discourage the provision of highly generous insurance plans that accommodate inefficient fee-for-service care.

Like Capretta and Miller, I wish that tax applied to more plans and started sooner. That it does not results from the refusal of Republicans in the course of the reform debate to do anything else than vote "no." The first president to embrace limits on the tax breaks for employer-financed health insurance was Ronald Reagan. Republicans have long embraced such reforms. Had they been true to their tradition and participated actively and constructively in this debate, as a previous generation of Republicans did in the debate leading up to the enactment of Medicare and Medicaid, and as Democrats did in the process leading up to the passage of the Medicare Modernization Act in 2003, there is little doubt that coverage of the tax on high-cost plans would have been broader and it would have started sooner.

The next fiction is the idea that there exists some market-based reform that would operate immaculately free of intrusive government regulation. If consumers are to exercise real leverage on insurance vendors, they have to understand the choices they face. That demands that the range of plans be limited to a manageable number, that marketing of insurance plans be highly regulated and that objective literature written in plain English must be available to customers. It also demands extensive risk adjustment of premiums and subsidies for those who cannot afford the full cost of health insurance. All of this will require heavy government involvement. Come to think of it, each of those steps is part of the health law. If a well-functioning private market place is what Capretta and Miller want, they should be celebrating the bill, not joining calls for its repeal.

No, the health reform debate is not about a fictional war between market-based health insurance and government regulation. It is about whether to provide adequate subsidies to cover the uninsured and whether to begin a process of leveraging change in the delivery and payment systems through which one-sixth of the U.S. economy is devoted to health care. Under this administration's leadership, the last Congress laboriously and narrowly pushed through legislation ending the crippling stasis that virtually all observers of the U.S. health care system deplore. Their handiwork is not perfect, nor can its full effects be anticipated. Further legislation will unquestionably be necessary—to fix provisions that don't work well and to deal with unanticipated consequences of the legislation. Making that legislation work as well as possible now and figuring out what legislation will make it work better in the future should occupy the nation now, rather than a sterile debate based on a false issue and misrepresentation. 

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.

An Army Wife Reflects On 'When The Men Are Gone' - NPR News

Posted: 18 Jan 2011 03:25 PM PST

Copyright ©2011 National Public Radio®. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.

January 18, 2011 - DAVE DAVIES, host:

This is FRESH AIR. I'm Dave Davies, sitting in for Terry Gross.

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have been fought in an age of embedded reporters, soldiers' blogs and YouTube videos from overseas and the home front. But our first guest, Siobhan Fallon, employs the traditional, low-tech form of short fiction to describe the lives of soldiers and especially their families.

Fallon is a military wife, and her new book is based largely on the experiences of Army families in Fort Hood, Texas. When soldiers leave on a deployment, she writes, their spouses somehow manage. They improvise. They take the strangeness and make it normal.

In her stories, wives have to deal with oil changes and home repairs, as well as loneliness, the crises of adolescent kids and, sometimes, infidelity and even death.

Siobhan Fallon is the wife of an Army major who earned her master's of fine arts in creative writing at the New School in New York City. She will soon be leaving for Jordan, where her husband will be stationed. I spoke to her about her book, called "You Know When the Men Are Gone."

Well, Siobhan Fallon, welcome to FRESH AIR. Tell us some of the changes in sight, sound, and routine at the base that tells you when the men are gone.

Ms. SIOBHAN FALLON (Author, "You Know When the Men Are Gone"): It's pretty obvious right from the first moment that the soldiers deploy because: one, there are so many to begin with. So as soon as the brigades start rotating out, you have this eerie sort of quietness and less cars.

There aren't the long lines to get into the front gates with all the pickup trucks. And, of course, all of the fast food places, they don't have the lines at the drive-thrus or the crowds that you would see at lunchtime or seven in the morning, when they - or actually, they have to be there earlier.

When they have to go into PT, you know, there's always a traffic jam on Battalion Avenue or something, like the soldier's room.

DAVIES: And PT is?

Ms. FALLON: Oh, the physical training that most of the soldiers do at the same time. It sort of puts a halt on the entire base.

And you just start to notice that there are more women and children because you don't have the balance of, you know, the males. And the females, suddenly you are just very aware of the families that are there, and they kind of take over.

You just see them, the kids running, playing, and the wives don't have as much to do in one area of their lives, or they're not worrying about taking care of their husbands as much. So they might have more free time to get together. So you might see them outside.

DAVIES: Now you write that, of course, that military wives rely on each other for companionship and babysitting and care and empathy. And they don't mix so much with civilians even though, I mean, there is a town there, Killeen, Texas, and then Austin, which is a pretty hip place, is only 70 miles away. Why is it that they find it hard to kind of mix with civilians?

Ms. FALLON: From my experience, and especially in a place like Fort Hood, where so much of the community is military to begin with, you're surrounded by spouses who have so much in common with you that it's just easier to form those friendships instead of maybe the civilian friendships that would include the husband that you suddenly don't have.

Or, you know, your soldier's away. It makes it a little more difficult to hang out with your friends who have their spouse with them, and that reminds you that your spouse isn't there.

DAVIES: Infidelity is one of the things that comes up here a lot, which isn't surprising because, you know, fears or suspicions of infidelity are part of any long-distance relationship, and, of course, these folks are experiencing long separation with enormous stress.

And I thought I would have you read a section from a story, and this was the case of a woman. The character's name here, I believe, is Kaylani(ph). She has not heard from her husband for awhile, and so she's so concerned that he hasn't been writing and returning her emails. She decides she's going to - well, she's going to find out for herself. Why don't you just read this section and explain what happens.

Ms. FALLON: Sure. So Kaylani sat down at the computer and, convinced it was the only thing she could do, broke into Manny's(ph) email. It wasn't hard. He had used the same password for as long as she had known him: monstermanny.

She accessed his account and glanced down the page, seeing her past missives: Are you OK? Javier(ph) took two steps today. And yesterday's email: Email me ASAP. All the while feeling something grow behind her lungs, something that wanted to swallow the air inside of her.

Most of the emails had not been opened yet, but her husband had definitely been online. A message from one of his high school friends, dated just two days before, was no longer in the new mail section.

At that point, she ought to have clicked on the mouse on the little X in the corner in the screen. She ought to have leaned back in relief, certain he was fine. But she felt the thing in her chest expand, and she continued skimming over the messages that Manny had read.

There was one from his brother, a forward from another buddy from home; something she hoped was junk mail, advertising pictures of Britney Spears' crotch; and one from a name she didn't recognize, a Michelle C. Rand(ph) at usarmy.mil, titled "So Lonely."

@usarmy.mil was tacked onto every active-duty soldier account as an email address. The mouse hovered, the little arrow pointing at So. Who was this Michelle Rand, and why was she telling Manny she was lonely? Kaylani clicked open.

Manuel, are you coming over Tuesday? My roommate is on duty. We will have the whole night. I want your body so bad. Let me know ASAP, Shel.

DAVIES: And that is how this Army wife discovers that her husband appears to be having an affair overseas. So when an Army wife discovers something like this, I mean, like anyone who's rocked by this news, there are many things they can do.

They can confront their husband by phone or email. They could talk to friends. They could move out. They could talk to their mothers. One thing that Army wives can do is report them to the command, and there would be consequences, wouldn't there, particularly if it was fraternizing with someone else in the military, as this husband seemed to be doing?

Ms. FALLON: And the husband's - or the soldier's command would probably have to act, and it could go anywhere, I think, from, like, an official reprimand that would go into the soldier's record or just, you know, like a non-official talking to the soldiers involved and probably trying to separate them or transfer them to a different unit.

That's one of the lines, I think, that the Army has to walk is that they are so involved with their soldiers 24 hours a day, and they have such control over their lives that something that, to the outside world, the civilian world, you know, your boss would have nothing really to do if you're committing adultery.

But the Army has to take that very seriously because the repercussions could endanger the lives of soldiers if it's happening during a deployment. It also could wreak havoc on the social structure at home, among the wives. They really need to make sure that the soldiers are as happy as possible, as well as the wives, because it's such a tightly woven community.

DAVIES: So if she reports this to the command structure, other people know, right? I mean, probably other people on the base, probably other people in the soldier's unit. And that's something that she has to think about, right?

Ms. FALLON: Oh, yeah, exactly.

DAVIES: Do you want to say what this woman did?

Ms. FALLON: In the case of this story, Kaylani decides to do nothing, and she approaches the wife of their commanding officer and then decides against telling her.

DAVIES: Right, he returns home, and she ends up wanting to confront him but not doing so, and then she discovers he's having - you know, he's seen horrible things, and he's having nightmares at night and chooses to just treat it as an experience that he'd had overseas where a lot of things happened that might be regrettable, but they're going to put it behind them. Do you find this sort of a common way of dealing with it?

Ms. FALLON: Yeah, when the soldiers come home, the spouses want to have a fresh start. And it's a fresh start for both of them because the spouses had that long, lonely year, and they know that their spouses, you know, the soldier has been through an awful lot.

And a lot of times, the soldiers really don't want to share all of the experiences, obviously, with their spouse. When they are in the war zone, they don't want their spouse to really worry about them and know what they might be going through.

And then when they come home, it seems almost like old news, like you're starting over, and usually you can be sent to a new base. So it gives this whole feel of a new life starting, and I think it's easier, then to almost pretend that the old life no longer exists or has an impact on the return.

DAVIES: There's another interesting kind of take on this. In the opening story of the book, which is called "You Know When the Men Are Gone," which is also, of course, the title of your book.

And your character meets this woman Natalia(ph), who is different from others, other wives on the base. Explain her story, how she's different.

Ms. FALLON: Well, Natalia was someone that her husband had met when he had been deployed previously to Bosnia. So she represents a massive threat to the spouses who are at Fort Hood because she's someone that the soldier actually brought, physically brought back from a deployment to replace the wife he had had.

And she's everything they fear most about: one, like, not knowing what's happening with the soldier who's overseas and that he might find someone younger and prettier and more stylish and exotic, in their eyes.

So she starts off as a threat just because of her background of having been the mistress, and then Natalia resists all of the efforts of the wives to become one of them. Like, she doesn't attend the meetings, and she doesn't wash the cars or bake the cookies or do the other things that creates, like, a cohesive wife community.

DAVIES: In your experience, do military wives talk about these threats of infidelity with each other? I mean, there's a moment in one of the books where someone says, well, there's so-and-so who's a female abroad in a support role in a unit, and she's a home-wrecker. Was there a lot of talk like that?

Ms. FALLON: I think it's definitely a fear, and it was actually one of the positive things about having a soldier in the infantry. And so some of the wives that I knew, we would joke about how lucky we are that there weren't women, and it was one of the only things we didn't have to worry about with our soldiers being deployed.

But when your soldier's away for an entire year, you're going to imagine the worst of everything that could possibly happen. It's just one of the many things that I think spouses would seize upon. And it's something that you could blame another person, you know, and it's something we would fear in ordinary American society.

So it's almost easier to imagine than the more horrific things that could happen to your soldier. So I think it was fed because it was part of the common experience versus the situations you wanted to avoid thinking about completely that might happen to a soldier deployed.

DAVIES: We're speaking with Siobhan Fallon. She's written a collection of short stories called "You Know When the Men Are Gone." We'll talk more after a short break. This is FRESH AIR.

(Soundbite of music)

DAVIES: If you're just joining us, our guest is Siobhan Fallon. She is a military wife who has written a collection of short stories about the experience. It's called "You Know When the Men Are Gone."

One story that you write, "Camp Liberty," the one that is set in Iraq, you're really following not a military wife, you're following, you know, a soldier, a sergeant who leads a unit in Iraq.

And the descriptions are very detailed and very evocative. I mean, I really feel like I'm in the Humvee with this guy and inside his head. I think I'd like to have you read a piece of your description of this soldier.

So this is a section where you're writing about a sergeant, a guy who had been an investment banker. His name is David Moguson(ph). In his civilian life, he was called David, but in the Army, they call him Mogue. And you're describing what he experiences after coming back from some time on leave, and he was sort of discontented, and his nose was running, and this is the description of when he's back with his unit.

Ms. FALLON: (Reading) His runny nose immediately dried up, and he felt alert again, awake at dawn to the call to prayer that reverberated around the base. It was as if his body had grown dependent on the 120-degree days and the 40-degree nights, the long-sleeve camouflage uniform and the heavy lace-up boots, the weight of the helmet and the 40-pound Kevlar vest, the tinny water fed to his mouth by a warm tube from the camelback slung over his shoulder, the churned-out high-calorie but tasteless eggs at the chow hall in the morning, the dried-out MRE bags in the afternoon, sleep-deprived nights of helicopters landing or mortars ringing with the usual bad aim against the perimeter of the base.

His body thrived in the desert. His Mogue thrived, while the weak little David crawled deeper into hibernation, and Mogue was seized with a terrible thought: What if, after all of his longing to get out and get on with his life, in his comfortable middle age, he would look back at this time and realize that his years in the Army were the most vivid, the most startling real of his entire life? Maybe he should not be getting out after all.

DAVIES: And that's Siobhan Fallon from her book of collective short stories, "You Know When the Men Are Gone."

You have a lot of photos of Fort Hood on your website, and there's one - which are really interesting to look at, by the way.

Ms. FALLON: Thank you.

DAVIES: They add a lot to story, if one wants to read the book. But there's one that - you have a picture of a sign at a parking area, and it says: reserved parking for a gold star family.

Ms. FALLON: Yes.

DAVIES: Explain that.

Ms. FALLON: Well, gold star is the euphemism for a family who's had a soldier die. It would be one of the parking spots at the very front of, you know, a commissary or BX. And it's kind of a scary reminder.

So all of the - you know, you drive by, when you go get your groceries, and you see that gold star spot, and you're just praying that you will never have to use it. And then, of course, it refers to other benefits, too. Like, gold star families are how we refer to families who have lost a soldier.

DAVIES: Yeah, I have to say it makes, you know, what for a lot of people is a private kind of pain very public.

Ms. FALLON: Yeah. Yeah, and that story of mine, "Gold Star," that's the issue that the protagonist is dealing with, whether she ought to take the spot or not because she knows as soon as she pulls into it, the entire parking lot will immediately know everything, which is almost everything her life has become at that point with her soldier having recently died.

And she has to weigh the importance of, you know, whether she wants to find a spot on a very busy day at the commissary or keep her grief to herself.

DAVIES: You know, you write that a military wife really has different lives that they live, you know, when the soldier is deployed and when he's not. And, in a way, you're busier, too. I mean, you're a single parent. You've got to balance the checkbook, and if there's a leaky faucet, either fix it or find somebody to fix it and, you know, change the kids' schedules.

And then a year later, the husband comes home. What are some of the adjustments that that requires?

Ms. FALLON: You know, it's pretty wild. I know, I've been through three deployments, and each time, I would assume they'd be easier because it's something I've done, but I just have - each time, I forget how much I would depend on my husband for these small details in my life that I didn't even realize he was doing and the things that he would naturally take care of.

And then suddenly he was gone, and I would have no idea what plumber we used or, I don't know, how to turn off the furnace or turn it back on or reset it, just these things that I can't call him to even find out.

So it's definitely a tremendous readjustment when your soldier leaves, and it's almost as big of a readjustment when he returns because after a year, you've actually finally figured out how to be independent and do everything that you need to do for your child or for yourself.

And then your soldier returns, and suddenly you both have been so independent, and now you need to become dependent on each other. So I think it's natural that there would be a little tension in that situation.

DAVIES: Right, and his head is, in some ways, still in, you know, life-threatening situations he was in and camaraderie with the unit that, you know, was primal.

Ms. FALLON: Right.

DAVIES: One of the interesting things that you write about are pamphlets that the Army gives soldiers on how they should behave when they return. Do you want to share some of the advice they give?

Ms. FALLON: The Army has really been trying very hard, I think, to handle all sorts of situations. And one of the things they make the soldiers do before they return is they have them fill out all of these surveys to pinpoint problems that they might have and that the soldiers might not even be aware of.

And then they return, and they all have to go to a certain amount of counseling sessions, and I think that's actually fairly new. My husband's most recent return, I remember he had a few days that he had to go to these long, long classes.

And, of course, you want your husband home, and then suddenly he's got to report in to work like the day after he returns. But I see the value in that, and I think it's - I mean, we all have that wonderful image of the reunion, and we think only that far. We don't really think beyond that.

DAVIES: I wanted to share some of the tips in a pamphlet that you write about in the book. These are things a soldier should remember, from this Army pamphlet when they come back:

No cursing. Your family members are not your men. They are not your squadron or platoon. They do not have to obey your orders. Your wife has been handling finances, disciplining the children during your absence. Don't expect to suddenly walk in and take over. Work with her, be patient. Tell her you appreciate the job she has done. Take time to be charming.

And then this fascinating one: Psychologists recommend that you do not engage in intercourse with your wife immediately upon return. Wait a few days, until she shows signs of responding to you. Be patient. Good advice?

Ms. FALLON: Yes, I think so. Most of that was actually taken from an Army pamphlet. So that's definitely advice that we're told.

And again, it's just something you kind of need to be reminded of when you have expectations that might not be met and from both points of view, you know, for the spouse, as well as the soldier. So it's good to know that there's a readjustment stage.

DAVIES: All right, well, I wish both you and your husband safety and good travels.

Ms. FALLON: Thank you.

DAVIES: Siobhan Fallon, thanks so much for being with us.

Ms. FALLON: Thank you, Dave.

DAVIES: Siobhan Fallon is leaving soon for Jordan, where her husband will be stationed. Her collection of short stories is called "You Know When the Men Are Gone." You can read an excerpt on our website, freshair.npr.org. I'm Dave Davies, and this is FRESH AIR.

Copyright © 2011 National Public Radio®. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to National Public Radio. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.